I finished reading Quicksilver in April (yes, I'm wayyy behind), and I rave about it. It is very strong in very many aspects that I really can't think of anything wrong with it (other than it was a very long read, which wasn't itself a bad thing because that's how you can have so many details, which makes it so realistic.) Despite its being historical "fiction", I was gripped by it so much it...
more I finished reading Quicksilver in April (yes, I'm wayyy behind), and I rave about it. It is very strong in very many aspects that I really can't think of anything wrong with it (other than it was a very long read, which wasn't itself a bad thing because that's how you can have so many details, which makes it so realistic.) Despite its being historical "fiction", I was gripped by it so much it seemed like historical "fact".
The three main protagonists--whose motivations vary from insanity to desire for empirical knowledge or wealth--are surrounded by a secondary cast of hundreds, weaving a multi-layered tapestry of intrigue, brother(and sister)hood, tragedy, and redemption. And he easily flows between, and integrates, the different characters seamlessly.
I read Cryptonomicon four years ago and was blown away by it (my first Stephenson novel)--this time, he's outdone himself. He is a master of subtleties, slapstick, metaphor, and meticulous details. I haven't picked up The Confusion yet, because I want to make sure I have the time and the preparedness to embark on the next incredible voyage. Definitely five out of five.
hide