Between 1960 and 1990 there were about 4400 scholarly writings (journals and books) on the “Problem of Suffering" (Plantinga). Fair enough, Ehrman contends that he doesn’t want to scuffle with academia, but he wants to distance himself from the “morally repugnant†intellectual abstractions and present a work that the proletariat can understand. Although I like...
more Between 1960 and 1990 there were about 4400 scholarly writings (journals and books) on the “Problem of Suffering" (Plantinga). Fair enough, Ehrman contends that he doesn’t want to scuffle with academia, but he wants to distance himself from the “morally repugnant†intellectual abstractions and present a work that the proletariat can understand. Although I like reading Ehrman – even though I disagree with many of his conclusions – I believe it is a fair criticism to claim that he nuances his writings in such ways that intend to captivate certain readers, however, such shadings are obvious to anyone who has contended with "theodicy." To me, this book comes across as if Ehrman believes that people, i.e. thinking people, have never thought of these issues. His vivid descriptions of the Holocaust, for instance, though chronicled by Holocaust historians, have engaged the imagination of most people, yet all we have here is Ivan Karamazov 2.0. Clearly Marcionite and cathartic.
hide