А well written, thought-provoking, but sometimes hysteria-inducing account of the 2nd "Cold War", the Kremlin's agressive foreign policy, pipeline politics and domestic repressive regime. 3 main problems: Lucas' too staunchly defended Atlanticism ("The EU must drop its lingering disdain for America"), suggesting that we should forgive the US for...
more А well written, thought-provoking, but sometimes hysteria-inducing account of the 2nd "Cold War", the Kremlin's agressive foreign policy, pipeline politics and domestic repressive regime. 3 main problems: Lucas' too staunchly defended Atlanticism ("The EU must drop its lingering disdain for America"), suggesting that we should forgive the US for fundamental mistakes which we wouldn't tolerate from other countries (such as Abu Ghraib, Guantánamo, recruiting allies by deception - "WMD's in Iraq"), because "faced with the Kremlin, Europe needs America more, than America needs Europe". Second: I think Lucas exaggerates Russia's global (economic) power. Third: a rather biased account of Russo-Georgian relations, lacking a serious critique of Georgia's own policies towards Abkhazia and S-Ossetia, sometimes even unquestioningly adopting Tbilisi's official propagandist narrative (e.g. "Chechen extremists" supporting the Abkhaz in 1992-1993...). But all in all an interesting study of the Putin era.
hide