“But the landscape of devastation is still a landscape.â€
Susan Sontag has always been interested in the relationship between war and photography; here she continues her excavation of images of suffering, and quarrels with ideas first explored in her earlier, famous work, “On Photographyâ€. She questions the widely popular view that within our culture of...
more “But the landscape of devastation is still a landscape.â€
Susan Sontag has always been interested in the relationship between war and photography; here she continues her excavation of images of suffering, and quarrels with ideas first explored in her earlier, famous work, “On Photographyâ€. She questions the widely popular view that within our culture of spectatorship“…as much as they create sympathy…photographs shrivel sympathy…†She writes about the dual powers of photography—to create documents and create works of art. She struggles with the contradiction of discovering and documenting images of beauty within the context of horrific atrocities. Although artful photography (of destruction and despair) presents a moral challenge, Sontag believes that photographs continue to be an important form of evidence, that contact with these images serves to enlarge us as human beings. She writes: “Someone who is perennially surprised that depravity exists, who continues to feel disillusioned (even incredulous) when confronted with evidence of what humans are capable of inflicting in the way of gruesome, hands-on cruelties upon other humans, has not reached moral or psychological adulthood…No one after a certain age has the right to this degree of innocence, of superficiality, to this degree of ignorance or amnesia.â€
The difficulty, as always, is that seeing and watching remain simply seeing and watching, no matter how close up or faraway you are. Near the end of the book she writes: “To designate a hell is not, of course, to tell us anything about how to extract people from that hell, how to moderate hell’s flames.†It’s true that repeated exposure to horrific images, however beautiful (or troubling? or careless? or manipulative?) they may be, might have diminishing impact. On the other hand, many people are moved to act when they see certain types of photographs.
Sontag refers to many specific images (drawings, paintings and photography—everything from Goya to Jeff Wall) in this book, though none are actually pictured alongside the text. Her discussion of the images made me want to seek them out, but I wonder if I will ever do that—seek them, out of my own free will? This in itself touches upon the same combination of laziness and fear that is more problematic than any photograph or news story might be. Despite it’s brevity (125 pages), this book will weigh heavily on anyone who reads it.
hide