Blake is quite difficult for me to understand; I'm not sure if most people have that problem when reading him or not, but the fact that he uses Homer, Ovid, the Ossian cycle, Spenser, Chaucer, Milton (oh my God, Milton...) and the Bible all as source material means that the average reader does not have the literary background needed to fully appreciate his work. Unfortunately, as a waded through...
more Blake is quite difficult for me to understand; I'm not sure if most people have that problem when reading him or not, but the fact that he uses Homer, Ovid, the Ossian cycle, Spenser, Chaucer, Milton (oh my God, Milton...) and the Bible all as source material means that the average reader does not have the literary background needed to fully appreciate his work. Unfortunately, as a waded through the Book of Thel, the Book of Ahania, the Marriage of Heaven and Hell and the First Book of Urizen, I realized that Blake is quite unlike most, modern authors in that much of his work is not just inspired by, but a reaction to, these works. Therefore, I found myself totally mystified by certain references and completely oblivious to certain ironies that only the (extremely helpful) commentary in the back of the volume could illuminate for me. That's no way to try to read one of the prime movers of English Romanticism. I suggest that anyone interested in Blake refer to the commentary at the back, where they will find the titles of works Blake used as source material. Familiarize yourselves with them first.
hide