Warning: lots of spoilers ahead.
First off, the books are incredibly well written. Most importantly, it's unique and original, unlike most fantasy writing these days. Rather than steal from writers like Tolkien and others, Pullman actually comes up with creative ideas. So from a literary standpoint, these three books are very, very good.
However, they are not children's books. It's not the...
more Warning: lots of spoilers ahead.
First off, the books are incredibly well written. Most importantly, it's unique and original, unlike most fantasy writing these days. Rather than steal from writers like Tolkien and others, Pullman actually comes up with creative ideas. So from a literary standpoint, these three books are very, very good.
However, they are not children's books. It's not the religious overtones, which I'll get to soon enough. As my friend Cory Watson pointed out in a blog post, it's the sexual overtones.
The story is largely centered around concepts of original sin and puberty. By the end of the trilogy, the main characters, a 12 year old boy and girl, discover their sexuality. It's not explicit, but it's blatant. Additionally, there are times when adults in the story interact among themselves or say things to the children that I would never want a child to read. It is for that reason that I have problems with the book. Sexual activity between children that are 12 years old is unconscionable.
On to the spiritual/religious aspects. So yes, God dies in the book. When people talked about it, I thought it was an active killing of God. In fact, it's passive. Pullman's concept of God in the book is that he was merely the first angel. Angels coalesced from Dust, a conscious, elementary particle. When other angels formed, Pullman's God claimed to have created them all, which was a lie. Some, knowing the truth, rebelled, following the story line of Milton's Paradise Lost. By the third book, the first angel, known as the Authority (but also referenced by Christian titles: Yahweh, Jehovah, Alpha and Omega--he doesn't beat around the bush), is incredibly old and decrepit. He reminded me of the king from The Princess Bride, in a way. He is kept safe in a sort of coffin-like container to protect him from the elements. During a battle, while he is being flown to safety, the angels protecting him are killed, the coffin falls and breaks, and after a few moments of being exposed to the elements the Authority disintegrates away by the wind.
Pullman's concept of God is far from omnipotent, omnipresent. In this world, he is unnecessary and irrelevant. Irrelevant is the perfect word, actually. Pullman in one sense follows Dawkins in his thoughts that religion is evil, but in the end appears to make the claim that God is irrelevant and we should just stop worrying about it at all, because it is powerless in the face of humanity? That may not be the right way to say it, but it feels right now.
His church is the stereotypical Catholic church from the Dark Ages (except that it was run by a guy named Calvin out of Geneva--sort of a Reformation gone wrong). They silence heretics, don't bat an eye at killing, and try to run people's lives ("for their own good"). Religion is about what one cannot do, and what the church needs to do to protect people from themselves and from sin.
So literary standpoint: excellent book. Sexual activity between children: bad. His religious foundation: false, and I'm sorry for it; I wish he could know the Authority that I know.
hide