You want an actual book review? This book is very typical of its time period, long and a bit tedious. I personally did not enjoy it, but in my high school of 1800 I only know two others that agree with me. The character of Jane is exasperating, she is very much a selfish bore - and while it is nice to have a protagonist who isn't picture perfect, her cdharacter is very over the top about it. ...
more You want an actual book review? This book is very typical of its time period, long and a bit tedious. I personally did not enjoy it, but in my high school of 1800 I only know two others that agree with me. The character of Jane is exasperating, she is very much a selfish bore - and while it is nice to have a protagonist who isn't picture perfect, her cdharacter is very over the top about it. The plotline is erratic, as if Bronte decided she didn't like the plot she had and thus switched it,, then becoming bored returned. The fire at the end seemed almost like BRonte was cheating and she wanted Jane and Rochester to get together, thus destroying the wife. Jane's forgiveness is very uncharacteristic, and although many would say it's because Rochester changed her, it feels too instant for that. The language in and of itself is beautiful in places, but very monotonous in others. In a scale from one to ten, ten being the best and one being the worst, I give this book about a two, but that only because it's not a textbook.
hide