Hands down, no equivocation, this remains my favorite book since first reading it 33 years ago, and despite decades spent reading everything else I get my hands on.
Essentially a "fairy tale," Rand's tight prose, economy of words, deft weaving of multiple plot lines and disparate characters, present a world not as it is but as it should be. Though the novel's primary...
more Hands down, no equivocation, this remains my favorite book since first reading it 33 years ago, and despite decades spent reading everything else I get my hands on.
Essentially a "fairy tale," Rand's tight prose, economy of words, deft weaving of multiple plot lines and disparate characters, present a world not as it is but as it should be. Though the novel's primary characters, Roark and Toohey, might be subject to criticism as too two-dimensional, too B/W, it's their relationships and interactions with the story's other characters - those inhabiting the "gray areas" - who create the "Rand dynamic" necessary to explore and convey her philosophy of Objectivism, while simultaneously crafting a masterwork of fiction that can be read on multiple levels.
Dominique and Keating, two sides of the same coin, struggle throughout to prove "worthy" in heart, mind and soul to the ideals exemplified by Roark. One fails, one succeeds. And few characters in American fiction rival the tragic fortune of Gail Wynand, someone who sensed the correct path early in life but cast his lot poorly when he chose power...
In an age when society values the politically correct, homogenization and subservience of individuality and personal desire to that of the herd, for the "greater good," during a time when nothing is anyone's fault and personal responsibility remains a scarce commodity, Rand's novel resonates more profoundly today than when it was released in 1943.
hide