Gardner's tone can be obnoxious. He continually references his own work, and he has very strong opinions about the purpose of literature, i.e. that a writer must believe in free will in order to be engaging, that shoddy work is an example of impurity in a writer's soul, that all good writing is subtly moral. Also, he rambles; the organization isn't very good.
Some of his advice...
more Gardner's tone can be obnoxious. He continually references his own work, and he has very strong opinions about the purpose of literature, i.e. that a writer must believe in free will in order to be engaging, that shoddy work is an example of impurity in a writer's soul, that all good writing is subtly moral. Also, he rambles; the organization isn't very good.
Some of his advice though, I think will be helpful: 1) Treat the "rules" only as tools to some purpose. 2) Use associations to create dynamic climaxes in longer forms, and the always popular 3) Write often and seriously.
hide