I don’t read Faulkner because is work is “literature” or technically challenging. I tend to pass by the most challenging pieces.
I read Faulkner because I enjoy the works I read, and I enjoy them because as I read I remember treasured things which are too easy to forget.
My childhood was peppered with Faulkner characters. My grandparents, their brothers and sisters, my elder cousins, the...
more I don’t read Faulkner because is work is “literature” or technically challenging. I tend to pass by the most challenging pieces.
I read Faulkner because I enjoy the works I read, and I enjoy them because as I read I remember treasured things which are too easy to forget.
My childhood was peppered with Faulkner characters. My grandparents, their brothers and sisters, my elder cousins, the friends they all grew up with, their peers at church: memories of these people; the depth and texture and tone of their daily lives rise up fresh and clear when I read Faulkner. These people did not order their lives by what was on television. These people knew Civil War veterans.
My favorite Faulkner works are now two: “Intruder in the Dust” and “The Reivers.” It’s no coincidence that both novels have a young male protagonist whose age dovetails in with my personal memories.
My advice to anyone who has been frustrated by Faulkner’s work is to read “Reivers,” where Lucius Priest retells an adventure from when he was eleven. The story is much more accessible than Faulkner’s masterpieces. It’s sometimes sniffed at or passed over by Faulkner “experts.” Bah, what do they know? “The Reivers” was Faulkner’s final novel, and it was his second work to win a Pulitzer Prize.
hide