My first Picoult novel. It is rare that, at base, not much can happen in a book, yet the characters are so vivid I cannot stop reading. True, horrific things DO happen in the novel, yet Picoult's characterization skills actually propel it. This is rare in mainstream fiction, and a welcome change. Further, she seems to be a talented writer, with an eye for well-crafted prose. Not surprisingly, her...
more My first Picoult novel. It is rare that, at base, not much can happen in a book, yet the characters are so vivid I cannot stop reading. True, horrific things DO happen in the novel, yet Picoult's characterization skills actually propel it. This is rare in mainstream fiction, and a welcome change. Further, she seems to be a talented writer, with an eye for well-crafted prose. Not surprisingly, her skills with dialog are topnotch. You might find yourself lost in this book simply because a large number of the characters seem quite real, instead of only wanting to know "what happens next."
As one might expect, the male characters, however, do not have much depth. Often, the reverse holds true for male authors creating female characters (Wally Lamb is an exception). If she did not want me to feel much for Peter, she succeeded. It became much easier to sympathize with Lacy, but not Peter's father, so much. The bullying was rough, sure, but I find it hard to believe Peter would have acted on that issue alone, no matter how long it went on. Something just seems to be missing, yet I don't know what, so cannot fault the author.
I did not find the twist surprising, as there are many clues well before the 200th page as to what will happen. In fact, I figured it out from one sentence, but won't say what page number. It was before p. 200.
The twist itself was satisfying, yet, like many, I felt as if Picoult suddenly grew tired of the novel, and ended it ASAP, in an almost sappy manner. Or that her editor/publisher removed the last 30 or 40 pages, and condensed them into 4 or 5. The way in which she leaves one of her deepest characters was quite annoying; almost as if she has a sequel planned. But the overall quality of the book makes up for such flaws. Too many people read to get to the end, but enjoying the world she creates here should be the reader's first priority.
One note. Though she was certainly free to write her book as she pleased, I believe she missed an opportunity to try her hand at a little bit of discussion of morality. Not in a preachy way, of course, but there was not a single mention of Peter's actions, in context to our society's (not necessarily religious) code of ethics, and even morality, beyond mere laws. Murder is murder, and is a crime, yes, yet why did he find himself able to end ten lives? We know ONE reason why he chose to do what he did, a response to bullying. But why else? Many of the "real life" Peters seem to have been motivated by the culture of moral relativism around them, within and beyond their schools, in which they believed themselves to not be responsible for their own actions, or accountable to no one but themselves. And, considering the topic Picoult chose to tackle (and did so tastefully), this could have been an interesting, non-biased, deeper element to the book.
But, of course, too many "should haves" distract from what is, in the end, a good read. It is rare to come across a bestselling author who puts characters before plot, yet does not bog you down with so much backstory you find yourself not caring. She picked her characters' histories well, and intertwined the past and the present perfectly.
A recommended read, and I'll be checking out her other works.
hide