Very good. The portrayal of a teenager with Asperger's fitted with my limited experience of communications with people with various levels of autism, and hopefully will help me communicate better in future. Plus the young man, Christoper, likes Sherlock Holmes and doesn't like yellow or brown, so I immediately developed a rapport! (My dislike of yellow and brown doesn't extend to...
more Very good. The portrayal of a teenager with Asperger's fitted with my limited experience of communications with people with various levels of autism, and hopefully will help me communicate better in future. Plus the young man, Christoper, likes Sherlock Holmes and doesn't like yellow or brown, so I immediately developed a rapport! (My dislike of yellow and brown doesn't extend to food, but I did wonder why Christopher took the custard creams).
As for the story itself, the murder wasn't much of a mystery if you don't have Asperger's - so although it's a mystery to Christopher, for those of us reading the story, the mystery is the workings of Christopher's mind. But everyone's mind is a mystery, our own included. Christopher's insight into the working of his mind is uncluttered and real, and made the story interesting to me from a Yogic and Zen Buddhist perspective too, which both seek to understand the mystery of mind.
Some of the techniques he uses to calm himself down are similar to yogic techniques for calming (holding his ears and groaning, for example, is similar to Brahmari Pranayama and the star watching has the effect of Unmani Mudra). There may be much more we can learn from people who have had to devise techniques for reducing the impact of too much incoming data. I wonder if yoga techniques are taught in special schools? The concept of non-dualism is also a major element of yoga (in the tradition of Shankaracharya), as it is in Zen Buddhism. Although both Yoga and Buddhism have this non-dual philosophy, the conclusions are very different indeed.
From a Buddhist perspective, I have recently been grappling with the concept of no permanent self, and the idea that there is no permanent soul or spirit. On a recent meditation retreat at Throssel Hole Buddhist Abbey, the Reverand Master leading the retreat referred frequently to 'The Ghost in the Machine' (Gilbert Ryle's description of Descarte's mind-body dualism). In chapter 163, Christopher gives a perfect description of how we come to think there is a ghost in our machine, "And when we look at things we think we're just looking out of our eyes like we're looking out of little windows and there's a person inside our head, but we're not. We're looking at a screen inside our heads, like a computer screen", and he goes on to describe how it is that we can use the mind to look at itself. This is the most succinct and elegant description of the position that there is no ghost in the machine that I have come across.
In yoga, there is a state of being known as the 'Witness State' which is what Christopher appears to be describing, but his conclusion is closer to Zen Buddhism than to Yoga. Here is a description of the Witness State from a yoga website, http://www.kundalini-teacher.com/chakras/witness.php :
"Q: Can you give me an explanation of the witness state?
"Kaliji: The witness state is a term for witnessing the play of the mind. Ultimately, one witnesses the mind to such depth that the witness is realized as the soul. First, the mind witnesses the body; then the higher mind (according to yoga terms, the Buddhi), witnesses the lower mind.
"Often the higher mind is thought of as the witness state. But to be aware of witnessing the mind there is a witness witnessing that. That is the Soul, the ultimate Witness in this Dual Consciousness. Witnessing the highest duality is the Non Dual State . . . Pure Consciousness ~ the Eternal Witness".
Here is Christopher's description:
"Because people can see the screen inside their head and they think there is someone in their head sitting there looking at the screen, like Captain Jean-Luc Picard in 'Star Trek: The Next Generation', sitting in his captain's seat looking at the big screen. And they think that this person is their special human mind which is called a ~homunculus~, which means ~little man~. And they think that computers don't have this homunculus.
"But this homunculus is just another picture on the screen in their heads. And when the homunculus is on the screen in their heads(because the person is thinking about the homunculus) there is another bit of brain watching the screen. And when the person thinks about this part of the brain (the bit that is watching the homunculus on the screen) they put this bit of the brain on the screen and there is another bit of the brain watching the screen. But the brain doesn't see this happening because it is like the eye flicking from one place to another* and people are blind inside their heads when they do the changing from thinking about one thing to thinking about another".
*Christopher has previously described this phenomenon, called 'saccades'
P.S.If Christopher's mum is a secretary, why is her spelling so poor
hide