Non-fiction. This is a self-help book - it's about "The Secret", which is the notion that thinking about what you want will get you what you want. That's it at its core. Obviously, it fleshes this notion out, telling you how to think about what you want in life (and how not to do it). It's basically divided into the different areas of life that you might want to use the "Secret" (eg. health,...
more Non-fiction. This is a self-help book - it's about "The Secret", which is the notion that thinking about what you want will get you what you want. That's it at its core. Obviously, it fleshes this notion out, telling you how to think about what you want in life (and how not to do it). It's basically divided into the different areas of life that you might want to use the "Secret" (eg. health, relationships, etc.). The entire book is written like so: the author credited for this book (Rhonda Byrne) has her paragraphs explaining the "Secret", and those paragraphs are interspersed with comments from contributors from different fields of work or expertise, or you know, whatever (there's Jack Canfield from the Chicken Soup books, and there are some doctors, and one person with a Ph.D.), all of them believers in the "Secret". There are also quotes from dead people or their works, I don't know. At the end there are biographies for these contributors (living and otherwise). As for the dead people quotes, well they are used to show us that these people believed in some kind of theory similar to the "Secret" capital S. I say "show" us and I mean it is presented a certain way. So unfortunately we wonder if the author who arranged this book is being a bit presumptuous or has taken things out of context. Normally it would be fine, because we'd just read the entire source the author quoted from to find out if anything WAS taken out of context. But we don't know where the hell she's quoting from! There's no bibliography! This is important because on the back of my book it claims that this is a secret that has been passed down for centuries and that many prominent historical people believed in it. They are named on the back as well. Unfortunately, except for the foreword of the book, there is no further analysis or description, if you will, of this. In the foreword, this is how the author says she came across the "Secret": by looking through historical works and discovering mentions everywhere of this "Secret". She turns her life around with it and finds a group of people, modern day believers in the Secret, and publishes a book and makes a video about the secret. That's what the author says in the Foreword. After all she had to come across it somewhere, surely she didn't just make it up and then find other people who happened to believe in this rather general theory as well - then "quote" historical people/works once or twice to show that this is indeed an ancient secret - without bothering to publish a bibliography showing us where we can find these works she came across! Assuming the dead people quotes in her book are those same sources she talks about in the foreword. So we wonder if she either A) came up with it on her own, which she says she didn't or B) she took liberties with the interpretation of several historical works or C) thought a bibliography wasn't needed. B sure seems a strong contender. The impression we're left with is that she didn't find a specific history of a specific secret being passed down in gritty detail, but rather she read a bunch of historical works and found generic mentions of believing in what you want in order to get it - then advertising it as if the dead people who wrote or said these things (SUPPOSEDLY) all belonged to some sort of historical secret club. We're left with the impression that these mentions she supposedly found are just that - general quotes from various people on life that happen to sound similar. It is advertised as if this is a specific Secret with a capital S. Of course this is to be expected but I think it detracts from the credibility of this whole work. There are also strange metaphysical claims that are made in this book with seemingly nothing to back them up. Nothing seems to be backed up. This is a non-fiction self-help book, that's not good. Of course, since this IS a book about faith, I guess we're supposed to take the book's word for everything it says. Well, if anything, it's extremely easy to read, if repetitive. It's mildly interesting to read all the various aspects of this complicated "Secret". This short little giftstore "self-help" book is okay to read the same way that books of quotes or thoughts on life are okay to read - for mild enlightenment, not serious self-help. Because as I've said a million times (I know, repetition - again), this doesn't come across as a serious self-help book. It should be. As for whether the secret works - which I'm sure most people would truly judge this book on - who knows? I got too distracted by all the ways this book has no credibility to actually care about using any of the stuff described. I don't care about whether or not the secret is real and works. That's how much credibility this book has, and how much influence it's had on me. At the end of the day, that's how a self-help book should be judged. Credibility. Because if it's got no credibility, who cares about trying it to see whether it works or not? Bottom line: this book was arranged inappropriately for a self-help book, making it lose its credibility, making anything it has to say null on a serious level. But on an entertainment level, it provides mild enlightenment the same way a book of quotes does. Because that's what this book seems like! Quotes with no bibliography. Bottom line #2: Read this book for the mild enlightenment/entertainment value.
hide